Home/Companies/GAN Limited
68 Brand Capital Score

A weighted composite of this company’s brand-capital drivers, 0 to 100.

64Brand equityThe brand as a durable commercial asset, 0 to 100.
-0.8MomentumThe change in the score since it was last derived.
63Financial strengthBalance-sheet and earnings strength, 0 to 100.
0SignalsPublished market signals that name this company.
B2B supplierB2B iGaming Software & Services

GAN Limited

Current signalPositioning Gap

The read

GAN Limited is a Nasdaq-listed B2B iGaming software provider primarily serving US land-based casino operators transitioning to online. Its SuperRGS platform aggregates third-party content for US-regulated markets.

What is on this page

The public read on GAN Limited. What it scores, what that score is built from, and where it sits against its shortlist. Every one of the 46 companies here is read the same way.

What a review adds

The free read stops at the position. A review adds the forward view: where value is leaking, what closing it is worth, and the moves in order. It is scored from GAN Limited’s own evidence, and you get it within 48 hours of asking.

The position

Where GAN Limited’s value sits

What the name is carrying, and the figures this company is tracked on.

The Brand Capital Score is 0 to 100. It is a weighted composite of the 7 drivers below. Every company on the board is scored on the same basis. What it answers: how much of this company’s worth is built by its brand and its customers, rather than bought each quarter.

GAN Limited scores 68, brand equity 64. That is 14th of 62 suppliers, never the whole market, because a buyer shortlists three to five names. It is a position, not a grade.

Brand-capital position

Brand equity 64 reflects a company that hasn't invested in brand capital relative to its technical capability. GAN's US market position is structurally advantaged, the brand narrative just hasn't caught up with the commercial reality.

What is being tracked
  • Nasdaq-listed (GAN), revenue ~$130M FY2025
  • Core clients: Sun International, various US tribal casinos
  • SuperRGS platform expanding content aggregation
  • Simulated gaming product for social casino operators
Peter Nikashin, Enterprise Value Architect
Peter Nikashin,
Enterprise Value Architect
▲ Reading GAN Limited

GAN Limited is performing ahead of its reputation. That gap is growth costing more than it should.

I grow your brand, your customers, and the money both return.

Your budget buys activity. I turn it into things that build over time: the price you can hold, the customers who stay, and what a buyer will pay for the business. Every move is specific, in order, and tied to a number.

Explore the system →

Every quarter you wait, the gap compounds.

The read in numbers

GAN Limited against the board

Four views of one company — what the score is built from, how much of it is brand, who it is weighed against and which way it is moving. Hover any figure for what it means.

The driver scorecard
Market penetration 66
Product depth 70
Financial strength 63
Brand equity 64
Commercial momentum 68
Regulatory standing 72
Tech 72
Brand equity in rust.

The 7 things the composite is built from, each scored 0 to 100 on the same basis as every other company on the board.

Why it matters

A single composite hides where the value actually sits. Two companies scoring 70 can be entirely different businesses, and the difference is what a buyer pays for.

Strongest on Regulatory standing, weakest on Financial strength. Brand equity sits at 64, and that is the driver that keeps paying after a good quarter ends.

Brand equity against the composite
68 Composite 64 Brand equity
050100
-4points behind the composite
Brand is the drag on this score.

Both figures on one 0 to 100 axis. The banded distance between the two marks is the whole point of the chart.

Why it matters

Revenue can be bought with discounting; brand equity cannot. When brand sits below the composite the business is running on terms it has to keep re-earning, and that shows up in the multiple long before it shows up in the revenue line.

Brand equity trails the composite by 4. The business is performing ahead of its reputation, so growth is costing more than it should.

The nearest peers
Betby 72
Bragg Gaming 70
GAN Limited 68
White Hat Gaming 67
Altenar 65
Soft2Bet 64
This company in rust.

The five companies scored closest to this one, ranked by composite.

Why it matters

Nobody is evaluated against the whole market. A buyer builds a shortlist of three to five comparable names, and these are the ones that would sit on it.

Within this set the spread is 8 points, so the composite alone will not separate them. Whatever decides the shortlist happens on the drivers underneath.

Momentum against the cohort
GAN Limited -0.8
Cohort median +1.4
Centre line is no change.

This company's score change beside the median change across its side of the board. The centre line is no movement.

Why it matters

Direction beats level over a holding period. A company gaining on a flat field is compounding a position; one sliding while the field rises is losing ground twice.

Moving at -0.8 against a cohort median of +1.4. Losing ground relative to the field even before the absolute change is read.

The next step on GAN Limited

Request an in-depth company review

The review, the diagnostic and the market-data forecast: what the company is worth today, where the value is leaking, and what the next four quarters look like if nothing changes.

See all companies