Home/Companies/PointsBet
52 Brand Capital Score

A weighted composite of this company’s brand-capital drivers, 0 to 100.

58Brand equityThe brand as a durable commercial asset, 0 to 100.
-1.5MomentumThe change in the score since it was last derived.
-8% YoYGrowthReported revenue growth year on year.
0SignalsPublished market signals that name this company.
B2C operatorAustralian Operator, US Divested

PointsBet

Current signalStrategic Reset

The read

PointsBet sold its US operations to Fanatics in 2023 and has refocused on its Australian home market. The reset leaves a smaller, more focused business with much less room to grow.

What is on this page

The public read on PointsBet. What it scores, what that score is built from, and where it sits against its shortlist. Every one of the 46 companies here is read the same way.

What a review adds

The free read stops at the position. A review adds the forward view: where it is losing you money, what closing it is worth, and the moves in order. It is scored from PointsBet’s own evidence, and you get it within 48 hours of asking.

The position

Where PointsBet’s value sits

What the name is carrying, and the figures this company is tracked on.

The Brand Capital Score is 0 to 100. It combines the 6 drivers below into one number. Every company on the board is scored the same way. It answers one question: how much of this company’s worth its brand and its customers have built, and how much it has to buy again every quarter.

PointsBet scores 52, brand equity 58. That is 18th of 21 operators. A buyer shortlists three to five names and compares only those, so the score reads as a position in the field.

Brand-capital position

Brand equity 58 reflects leftover US brand equity (now sold) and moderately strong Australian recognition. After the US exit, the brand needs repositioning for its smaller ambition.

What is being tracked
  • ASX-listed (PBH), revenue ~AUD $200M FY2025
  • #4 Australian online sports betting brand
  • US business sold to Fanatics for ~$225M in 2023
  • PointsBetting product innovation (patented) retained
Peter Nikashin, Enterprise Value Architect
Peter Nikashin,
Enterprise Value Architect
▲ Reading PointsBet

PointsBet’s brand is worth more than its numbers currently show. That gap is room to charge more that nobody is using.

I grow your brand, your customers, and the money they bring in.

Your budget buys activity. I turn it into things that build over time: the price you can hold, the customers who stay, and what a buyer will pay for the business. Every move is specific, in order, and tied to a number.

Explore the system →

Every quarter you wait, the gap grows on itself.

The read in numbers

PointsBet against the board

Four views of one company — what the score is built from, how much of it is brand, who it is weighed against and which way it is moving. Hover any figure for what it means.

The driver scorecard
Revenue & growth 50
Brand equity 58
Product differentiation 52
Retention 52
Regulatory standing 54
Digital 52
Brand equity in rust.

The 6 things the composite is built from, each scored 0 to 100 on the same basis as every other company on the board.

Why it matters

A single score hides where the value sits. Two companies scoring 70 can be very different businesses. The difference is what a buyer pays for.

Strongest on Brand equity, weakest on Revenue & growth. Brand equity sits at 58, and that is the driver that keeps paying after a good quarter ends.

Brand equity against the composite
52 Composite 58 Brand equity
050100
+6points ahead of the composite
Brand is carrying this score.

Both figures on one 0 to 100 axis. The banded distance between the two marks is the whole point of the chart.

Why it matters

Discounting can buy revenue. It cannot buy brand equity. When brand sits below the overall score, the business has to keep re-earning its position. That shows up in the price a buyer will pay long before it shows up in revenue.

Brand equity leads the composite by 6. The name is worth more than the numbers currently show. That is a chance to charge more.

The nearest peers
Tipico 58
Parimatch 55
PointsBet 52
Lottoland 50
The Sharps 48
Sportnation / Evoke 46
This company in rust.

The five companies scored closest to this one, ranked by composite.

Why it matters

Nobody is evaluated against the whole market. A buyer builds a shortlist of three to five comparable names, and these are the ones that would sit on it.

Within this set the spread is 12 points, so the composite alone will not separate them. Whatever decides the shortlist happens on the drivers underneath.

Momentum against the cohort
PointsBet -1.5
Cohort median flat
Centre line is no change.

This company's score change beside the median change across its side of the board. The centre line is no movement.

Why it matters

Direction matters more than level over time. A company gaining on a flat field is building its position. One sliding while the field rises is losing ground twice.

Moving at -1.5 against a group median of flat. Losing ground relative to the field even before the absolute change is read.

The next step on PointsBet

Request an in-depth company review

The review, the diagnostic and the market-data forecast: what the company is worth today, where it is losing value, and what the next four quarters look like if nothing changes.

See all companies